State of Veterinary Practice Operations: Front Desk and Operational Overview
Staffing Shortages and Burnout
Veterinary clinics across the U.S. are experiencing chronic staffing shortages in front desk and support roles, accompanied by high turnover and burnout. Annual employee turnover rates in veterinary practices significantly exceed broader industry norms – for example, receptionists had a 32.5% turnover rate (annual) as of 2020, compared to a national average under 20%[1]. Veterinary technicians and assistants also see elevated turnover around 23–33%, far higher than practice managers (~10%) or veterinarians (~16%)[1]. The table below summarizes turnover benchmarks by role:
|
Staff Role |
Annual Turnover Rate (2020) |
|
Receptionists (Front Desk) |
32.5% [1] |
|
Veterinary Technicians |
23.4% [1] |
|
Associate Veterinarians |
16.0% [1] |
|
Practice Managers |
10.3% [1] |
|
Other Support Staff (Assistants, etc.) |
32.9% [1] |
Staffing shortages are widely reported. In one nationwide survey of nonprofit clinics and shelters, 72% of organizations reported being short-staffed in both veterinarian and support staff positions[2]. These shortages lead to significant operational strain – clients wait longer for appointments (over half of low-cost clinics had wait times over 2 months for care[3]) and remaining staff face heavier workloads, contributing to a cycle of burnout.
Burnout and mental health challenges among veterinary support staff are pervasive. A late-2023 study (Merck Animal Health Veterinary Wellbeing Study) surveyed 2,271 non-veterinarian team members and found that serious psychological distress was twice as prevalent among support staff as among veterinarians[4]. Approximately 20% of veterinary team members screened positive for serious distress (on a K6 psychological distress scale) – for example, about 26% of veterinary assistants and ~10% of practice managers were in serious distress[5]. Burnout levels among support staff were reported to be comparable to veterinarians on average[6], with roughly 20–30% of staff experiencing high burnout (e.g. an estimated 24% of assistants, 20% of receptionists/managers, and 31% of technicians had high burnout in one 2023 analysis). In qualitative terms, this manifests as physical and emotional exhaustion, compassion fatigue, increased errors, absenteeism, and intent to leave the field. Notably, support staff report lower overall well-being than veterinarians – only about one-third of veterinary assistants and 39% of client service reps (CSRs) described themselves as “flourishing,” compared to ~52% of practice managers[7].
Multiple factors drive these staffing crises. Low compensation and benefits are a primary issue: nearly 60% of support staff are unhappy with their income[8], and 68% ranked low pay as their biggest challenge in one recent survey[8]. Indeed, one in four support staff works a second job to make ends meet[9]. Veterinary technicians average under $40k annual salary (roughly on par with entry-level service jobs), despite having specialized education[10][11]. Such wage dissatisfaction was the number-one factor for staff attrition in a 2023 AAHA survey – 91% of non-DVM staff who planned to leave cited “fair compensation” as a top concern, far more than any other issue[12]. Another major factor is burnout and poor utilization of skills. Surveys show that many credentialed technicians feel their skills are underused – they feel like “glorified pet holders” rather than being allowed to use their training[13] – leading to frustration and lack of career fulfillment. It’s well documented that “when credentialed veterinary technicians are not efficiently utilized, they’re likely to feel less engaged,” which contributes to turnover[14]. Front-desk staff likewise often endure stressful client interactions (sometimes including abuse from frustrated pet owners) and heavy multitasking for relatively low pay, fueling emotional exhaustion. A lack of appreciation and support from leadership is also frequently cited – feeling undervalued was the second-most common reason staff consider leaving, according to the AAHA retention survey[15].
The COVID-19 pandemic pet boom exacerbated these trends by increasing patient loads without commensurate staffing, leading to “overuse” of the existing workforce. Many clinics have been operating understaffed for prolonged periods, causing overwork. This has tangible financial and human costs: One recent analysis estimated the economic cost of burnout in veterinary medicine at $1–2 billion annually when accounting for reduced productivity, turnover, and mental health impacts[16]. Moreover, surveys indicate over 40% of veterinarians had contemplated leaving the profession early (pre-retirement), with burnout frequently cited as a key driver[17] – and similar sentiments are echoed by technicians and assistants. The veterinary profession also faces a mental health crisis, with support staff and veterinarians at higher risk of anxiety, depression, and suicide than the general population[18]. In short, staffing shortages and burnout form a self-reinforcing problem: insufficient staffing leads to overwork and burnout, which in turn drives higher turnover and vacancies. Addressing this will require both boosting the pipeline of trained staff (e.g. increasing graduation of vet techs) and improving retention by creating better working conditions, pay, and mental health support.
Workflow Inefficiencies and Bottlenecks in Operations
Many veterinary practices are also challenged by workflow inefficiencies and process bottlenecks that strain both staff and finances. Studies have found that a substantial fraction of clinics operate below optimal efficiency. A 2023 AVMA economic analysis of 60 companion animal practices used data envelopment analysis to quantify efficiency: only 42% of practices were fully efficient, while 58% had moderate-to-low efficiency (meaning they could produce the same output with fewer resources)[19]. On average, moderately efficient clinics could achieve their current workload with ~17% less resources, and low-efficiency clinics with 34% less[19]. In practical terms, the researchers calculated that if all 60 clinics in the study ran at 100% efficiency, they would collectively need 47 fewer veterinary technicians/assistants and 43 fewer front-desk staff (and even 22 fewer veterinarians) to handle the same caseload[20]. This indicates that inefficient processes are forcing clinics to compensate by overstaffing or overworking the staff they have. In an era of staff shortages, closing this efficiency gap is critical – “efforts to optimize efficiency could allow practices to meet service demand without necessarily needing to hire more staff,” the study concludes, recommending better use of support staff skills and workflow automation[21].
Common operational bottlenecks include:
- Heavy phone and administrative workload: Front desk teams often juggle constant ringing phones, appointment scheduling, billing, and in-person client service simultaneously. This can lead to long hold times, dropped calls, and errors. One industry analysis noted that inefficient “synchronous” workflows like phone tag consume significant staff time, whereas moving tasks to asynchronous methods (online booking, messaging) can free up capacity[22]. In many clinics, receptionists spend an inordinate part of the day on the phone, which not only bottlenecks client service but also increases stress on those employees. A case study (West Coast Hospital in San Diego) showed that after introducing online appointment scheduling, they saw a 30% reduction in call volume – allowing front desk staff to handle other tasks more calmly[23]. Without such solutions, the front desk can become a rate-limiting step, where administrative backlogs ripple through the hospital (appointments get delayed, clients face longer wait times, etc.).
- Under-utilization of support staff: Inefficient delegation of tasks is a well-known drag on veterinary clinic productivity. When veterinary technicians and assistants are not used to their full training, veterinarians end up doing routine technical tasks – slowing down overall workflow and causing frustration. AVMA reports have emphasized that “inefficient staff utilization hurts our practices”; when skilled techs are relegated to fetching pets or holding animals rather than performing treatments or diagnostics within their competencies, the practice loses efficiency and those staff feel less engaged[14]. For example, a veterinarian who must draw blood, take x-rays, fill prescriptions, and do data entry (because of either staffing shortages or trust issues) will see far fewer patients per day than one working with a fully empowered tech/nurse team. Research confirms that leveraging more support staff per doctor increases productivity: one study found that adding non-veterinarian staff significantly increases revenue and doctor output in companion animal practices[24]. Conversely, many clinics have not yet adopted “team-based care” models that let doctors focus on medical decision-making while nurses/techs handle technical procedures – representing an efficiency opportunity.
- Training and workflow inconsistencies: High turnover and understaffing mean many clinics are constantly onboarding new employees, yet lack time for thorough training. This leads to inconsistent protocols, mistakes, and duplicated efforts. As one veterinarian described, constant short-staffing meant “whoever is on hand” must cover tasks, and because there’s no slack, new hires get little coaching – resulting in errors that slow everyone down. In a commentary in DVM360, a medical director noted that with frequent staff call-outs and vacancies, veterinarians often have to “step into other roles” (lab work, cleaning, answering phones) just to keep the clinic running, at the expense of their primary duties[25]. She reported sometimes having to stay 2–3 hours past closing just to finish medical notes because doing support tasks during the day ate into her documentation time[25]. This scenario is common when workflows are brittle: if one team member is missing, the whole process slows. Inadequate cross-training and lack of standard operating procedures (SOPs) can worsen these bottlenecks – staff spend extra time figuring out processes on the fly or correcting avoidable mistakes.
- Manual and paper-based processes: Many clinics still use paper forms, physical filing, or non-integrated software, which creates redundant data entry and search inefficiencies. For instance, if medical notes are handwritten and later typed into a system (or if lab results have to be scanned and attached), that’s double work. At the AVMA Economic Forum 2023, experts pointed out that small investments in technology – from electronic medical records to automated reminder systems – can yield outsized efficiency gains by eliminating tedious tasks[26][27]. Inefficiencies like these not only waste staff time but also introduce opportunities for errors (e.g. transcription mistakes) that then require even more time to fix.
Ultimately, these operational inefficiencies translate to longer client wait times, fewer patients seen per day, and staff burnout. The good news is there are known remedies. Practices that streamline workflows and embrace efficiency tools can handle more caseload with the same staff. Engaging veterinary technicians to their full potential and implementing automation (for scheduling, reminders, medical record keeping, etc.) are repeatedly cited as ways to improve throughput[21]. For example, using electronic treatment charts and voice-to-text dictation can cut down doctors’ paperwork time, freeing them to see another appointment per day. Similarly, converting paper consent forms to digital versions that clients fill in online before their visit can eliminate bottlenecks at check-in. An AVMA study concluded that if practices adopt such measures and raise their average efficiency closer to top-performing clinics, they could “meet the growing demand for services without solely depending on hiring more staff”[21] – a critical insight given how tight the labor market is. In summary, reducing workflow bottlenecks is a key opportunity area for veterinary operations, with direct benefits to productivity, employee morale, and profitability.
Appointment Scheduling Systems and Effectiveness
Appointment scheduling is one of the most critical operational workflows in veterinary practice, and it has seen significant changes in recent years. Traditionally, appointments have been booked via phone calls, which places a heavy burden on front desk staff and can be inefficient for both the clinic and clients. Many clinics have struggled with overbooked schedules, long lead times for appointments, and no-show or late cancellation issues. Recently, there’s been a push towards modernizing scheduling through technology, with a focus on improving access and efficiency.
One notable trend is the adoption of online scheduling systems. These allow clients to book appointments via a website or app, often integrating directly into the practice management software. While as of a couple years ago only about 25–30% of veterinary practices offered true online booking (estimates vary)[28][29], the number is growing rapidly because of demonstrated benefits. For example, West Coast Animal Hospital (San Diego) implemented an online scheduling platform in March 2022 and saw immediate positive results. About 25% of all appointments are now made online at that practice, and tellingly 35% of those online bookings occur after business hours[23] – indicating that many clients appreciate the flexibility of booking at night or on weekends when the clinic phones are closed. This translated into a tangible reduction in receptionist workload: the clinic reported a 30% reduction in call volume once online booking went live[30]. Importantly, this wasn’t because they had fewer appointments – in fact, allowing 24/7 self-service booking slightly increased overall appointment count and revenue (about 2% increase in revenue) attributable to capturing appointments they might have otherwise missed[30]. Rather, fewer inbound calls meant the front desk staff could devote more attention to in-clinic clients and other tasks, reducing stress and wait times. “Instead of putting everyone on hold and putting out fires, you convert from a synchronous to asynchronous workflow,” explained the co-owner, highlighting that clients can serve themselves for simple tasks like scheduling[22].
That said, simply opening up online scheduling without guardrails can introduce new challenges, such as potential duplicate bookings or inappropriate appointment reasons chosen. Successful implementations have addressed this by adding confirmation steps and policies. In the West Coast example, they created a dedicated administrative role to audit incoming online appointments in real-time and required appointment deposits and automated reminders to discourage no-shows[31][32]. The result was that no-show rates actually dropped below their previous levels after these measures – clients who self-book receive text/email reminders and have skin in the game via a deposit, so they are more likely to show up[32]. The clinic also noted far fewer scheduling errors: with integration to their practice calendar, double-bookings and lost appointments “don’t happen as much” because the system prevents overlaps and captures client entries directly[33]. These experiences suggest that when executed properly, online scheduling can improve efficiency and client satisfaction simultaneously – but it should be phased in carefully (e.g. “Ease into it… Don’t open your entire calendar at first” one expert advises)[34] and supported by robust reminder systems.
Despite the rise of online tools, phone scheduling remains dominant in many practices – and a source of inefficiency. Front desk staff often must handle complex scheduling matrices (matching appointment types to appropriate time slots and doctors), all while fielding calls in real time. This can lead to suboptimal outcomes like clients being placed on hold or rushed phone interactions that result in mis-booked appointments. Some practices have responded by using remote call centers or overflow booking services so that incoming calls don’t swamp the reception at peak times[35]. Additionally, many clinics now use automated waitlist and callback features: if a day’s schedule is full, clients can be waitlisted and automatically notified if a cancellation opens a slot, ensuring openings are backfilled efficiently.
Another development is the use of teletriage and telemedicine in scheduling workflows. Although most pet appointments still happen in-person, certain issues can be handled via telehealth consults, which can triage cases and potentially free up slots for those truly needing a physical exam. A pilot study in 2021–2022 indicated that telehealth for minor cases can reduce appointment backlog and improve client convenience, though regulatory and workflow integration issues are still being worked out[36].
Appointment lead times and access to care have become hot topics, especially after the pandemic pet boom. Client demand surged, and many general practices booked out weeks in advance for routine appointments. In one survey of 6,500+ U.S. clinics (mostly general practices), the average time between pet visits increased to ~86 days in 2023–2024, a 48% jump in interval length compared to three years prior[37]. In other words, clients are coming in less frequently, either by choice or because they can’t get an appointment sooner. Part of this is due to economic factors (some owners are spacing out vet visits to save money amid inflation)[38], but part is pure capacity – many clinics stopped accepting new clients or had 2-3 week waits for wellness visits. Specialty and emergency hospitals have been even more backlogged, sometimes diverting cases due to lack of slots. This situation has pressured practices to optimize scheduling: forward-booking (scheduling the next appointment before the client leaves), using longer clinic hours or adding weekend days, and leveraging technician appointments (for things like vaccine boosters or nail trims) to open doctors’ schedules for medical cases. Some clinics have adopted “pod” scheduling or block systems to ensure walk-in emergencies can be accommodated without derailing the whole day.
In terms of effectiveness of scheduling systems, the key metrics practices watch are no-show rate, average days to next available appointment, and client satisfaction. As noted, deposit policies and reminder systems (text/email/phone reminders 1–2 days prior) are standard now and have greatly reduced no-shows. Industry surveys suggest that clinics requiring appointment confirmation or a deposit see far fewer missed appointments. Automated reminder tech is quite effective: one analysis found a 17.9% drop in missed appointments and significant revenue recapture after implementing a sophisticated reminder and rebooking system[39][40]. Moreover, offering same-day or next-day appointment options online can capture urgent cases that might otherwise go to an emergency clinic – some online systems report 26% of online bookings are for within 1–2 days if available[28], showing that clients will take the first open slot they find.
In conclusion, the scheduling arena in vet medicine is evolving toward greater flexibility and client self-service. When done right, modern scheduling tools improve operational flow (by cutting phone tag and smoothing out appointment utilization) and enhance client experience (by providing convenience and timely care). However, not all practices have caught up – many still rely on legacy appointment books or basic calendar software. The trend over the past 1–5 years is clearly toward digital transformation of scheduling, which is poised to continue as clinics strive to handle high demand with limited staff.
Client Communication Methods and Client Retention Strategies
Effective client communication is integral to veterinary operations, impacting everything from daily efficiency to long-term client retention. In recent years, practices have expanded beyond traditional phone calls and paper mailers to include email, texting, mobile apps, and social media as key communication channels. This shift is driven by client preferences and the need for more scalable, timely outreach. Surveys consistently show that pet owners increasingly prefer digital communication for routine matters – especially text messages – whereas phone calls are reserved for urgent or complex conversations. Yet many practices have been slow to adapt, creating a gap between what clients want and what clinics provide.
Current data highlight this preference gap. According to a recent National Pet Owners survey, 57% of pet owners still receive veterinary appointment reminders via phone call, while only about 25% receive reminders by text message[41]. However, when asked their preference, the vast majority lean toward texting: in one poll, 86% of pet owners said they want text message appointment reminders (even if they also get a phone call)[42]. In fact, only 29% of pet owners prefer phone calls as the primary mode of communication for updates and reminders[43]. Millennials, now the largest pet-owning demographic, strongly favor convenient digital communication – 57% of millennial pet owners want texts for routine communications about their pet’s care[42]. These statistics have prompted many clinics to invest in two-way texting platforms and messaging apps. Practices that use text or app-based communication report improved response rates and client satisfaction. Unlike phone calls (which may go to voicemail), text messages are typically read quickly; clients appreciate the ability to confirm appointments or ask simple questions via text at their convenience.
Beyond appointment reminders, clinics are using technology to streamline client service and enhance retention. Some key communication and retention strategies include:
- Multi-channel appointment reminders: Most practices now send automated reminders via email, SMS, and sometimes app notifications for upcoming appointments, vaccinations due, or preventative care. These systems often allow clients to confirm with a click or even reschedule. By 2023, an industry survey noted that about 31% of veterinary practices viewed online appointment scheduling (with integrated reminders) as the most important feature of their website[44][45], reflecting the value placed on digital client engagement. Reminder systems reduce no-shows and keep pets on track with wellness care, which in turn improves clinical outcomes and revenue.
- Two-way texting and live chat: Many clinics have adopted tools to allow clients to text the front desk or use a web chat for questions (e.g. medication refill requests, checking on a hospitalized pet, curbside check-in messages). This reduces phone tag and holds. An oft-cited figure is that most clients don’t want to use the phone if given a viable alternative[46]. Providing text/chat options can increase client loyalty – they feel the clinic is accessible. For example, the Vet2Pet client app offers in-app chat and SMS; Vetsource (a veterinary pharmacy/analytics company) found that practices using such apps generated on average 600 appointment requests per year through the app alone[47], indicating significant client engagement outside of phone calls. These digital conversations also create written records (useful for tracking requests and follow-ups) and free up phone lines for more urgent calls.
- Educational and benefit-focused messaging: Research in Frontiers in Veterinary Science suggests that clients respond positively to “benefit-focused” communication – messages that clearly explain why a recommendation benefits their pet, rather than just stating it’s due or needed[48]. In one study, 58% of pet owners preferred emails that emphasized the benefits to their pet’s health[49]. Practices are increasingly sending follow-up emails or texts with content like “Here’s why Fluffy’s dental cleaning will improve her quality of life…” or links to blog posts/videos on what to expect during a procedure. These not only educate clients (improving compliance) but also demonstrate value, which can bolster trust and retention.
- Social media and community engagement: Many hospitals maintain an active Facebook or Instagram presence to celebrate patient stories, share pet health tips, and make announcements. While not a direct one-to-one communication, social media engagement keeps the clinic top-of-mind for clients and fosters a sense of community. However, practices must handle social platforms carefully; they can be double-edged if negative reviews or comments appear. Still, a friendly social media presence can enhance client loyalty and even attract new clients via word-of-mouth shares.
- Client feedback and service recovery: Modern client communication includes soliciting feedback. Clinics often use email or text surveys after visits to gauge satisfaction. Automated systems can invite clients to post reviews or alert the staff to any issues. Rapidly addressing complaints or misunderstandings (sometimes via a quick personal call or message from the practice manager) can turn a negative experience into a positive one, improving retention. Some practices have instituted loyalty programs (points or rewards for frequent visits/purchases) communicated via app or email, which encourage return visits.
Retention strategies in the veterinary context revolve around keeping clients engaged with the practice for the long term – important given that slight decreases in visit frequency have been observed. The Vetsource analysis in 2024 found a 2.3% drop in total visits year-over-year and a slight decline in active patients, correlating with financial pressures on pet owners[37]. To combat this, practices are focusing on proactive outreach: for instance, generating lists of pets who are overdue for vaccines or exams and sending reminders or personal phone calls to encourage scheduling. Sophisticated systems like AllyDVM’s “retention calendar” sync with practice records to flag lapsing clients and missed services, then prompt staff to reach out[39][50]. In one case, using such a system led to recovering $59,000 in revenue over 9 months by bringing pets in that would have been overlooked[39][40].
Another retention tactic is offering wellness plans or membership programs. While not every practice does this, those that do package routine services into monthly subscription plans find that it secures regular visits (since clients have prepaid incentives) and spreads costs out for clients. According to AAHA and other organizations, wellness plan adoption has grown in the last 5 years as a win-win: pets get consistent preventative care, clients avoid large one-time bills, and practices build loyalty.
Finally, building strong client relationships through personal touches remains fundamental. Many front desk staff and technicians make a point to personally follow up with clients after a pet’s surgery or illness, often via a quick phone call or text to check on the pet’s status. This kind of empathy-driven communication improves client satisfaction and trust. A Vetsource white paper noted that clinics which “focus on client relationships and offer solutions beyond the four walls of the practice” are best positioned to thrive in the current environment[51]. In other words, practices that engage with clients’ needs holistically – whether through telehealth options, transparent and frequent communication, or community support events – tend to retain those clients even as competition and costs rise.
In summary, U.S. veterinary practices are rapidly expanding their communication toolkits: text and app messaging, email education, and proactive reminders are becoming as commonplace as phone calls and postcard mailers were in the past. These methods not only drive operational efficiency (e.g. saving staff time by reducing phone tag) but also are key to client retention in a time when pet owners have many choices for care. The data suggests that meeting clients where they are – on their smartphones, with timely and benefit-driven communication – results in better compliance with veterinary recommendations and stronger loyalty to the practice.
Billing Practices, Collections Challenges, and Financial Workflows
Veterinary medicine operates largely on a fee-for-service, pay-at-time-of-service model in the U.S., which means efficient billing and collections processes are essential for practice viability. Unlike human healthcare, there is no extensive insurance infrastructure handling payments for the majority of vet visits (pet insurance is growing but only about 3-4% of pets in the U.S. are insured, so most clients pay out-of-pocket). This reality shapes how veterinary clinics handle billing, and it also exposes them to financial risks when clients cannot pay. In the past 1–5 years, with economic fluctuations and rising veterinary costs, collections challenges have become more pronounced, prompting clinics to re-examine their financial workflows and payment options.
Standard billing practices in well-managed clinics involve presenting an estimate up-front, obtaining client consent, and then collecting payment in full at the end of the visit or procedure. The mantra “payment is due at time of service” is common. This approach minimizes accounts receivable (A/R) and ensures healthy cash flow. However, not all practices adhere strictly to it. Culturally, many veterinarians are conflict-averse about money – “No veterinarian wants to be seen as the bad guy” when it comes to billing, as one practice management expert put it[52]. Historically, especially in large-animal or equine practice, vets would often bill clients later (sending an invoice after the farm call, for example). In small-animal clinics, some still allow short-term invoicing or payment delays for longstanding clients. The downside of leniency is poor A/R turnover and potential bad debt. An illustration from an equine practice showed that by routinely billing out later, the practice ended up taking ~45 days on average to collect payments – far above the 30-day target – essentially giving interest-free loans to clients and hurting their own cash flow[53]. A low accounts receivable turnover or high days-to-collect is a red flag: “Not collecting payments on time can create serious cash flow problems,” and indeed, unpaid balances often equate to lost revenue if not pursued[54].
Collections challenges arise when clients either cannot or will not pay their bills. Most clinics have a small percentage of invoices that go unpaid and end up in collections. Some key points and trends:
- Client financial constraints: Veterinary care costs have been rising (8% year-over-year increase in service costs was noted in 2024, outpacing general inflation[38]), and many pet owners struggle to afford large, unexpected vet bills. Research by access-to-care nonprofits found that about 1 in 4 pet owners (27.9%) experienced an inability to obtain needed veterinary care in the past two years, primarily due to financial barriers[55]. This means clinics are frequently confronted with clients facing economic hardship, which can lead to difficult conversations about payment. In some cases, pets are not brought in as often as they should be (owners delay care due to cost), which can in turn create bigger, costlier health problems down the line – a vicious cycle.
- Payment plans and third-party financing: To bridge the gap between clients’ financial capacity and pet health needs, many clinics have begun offering payment options beyond “pay now or nothing.” Third-party credit services like CareCredit have long been available – clients apply for a line of credit to pay vet bills, and the clinic gets paid upfront by the finance company (minus a fee). In the last 5 years, newer fintech companies (Scratchpay, VetBilling, etc.) and in-house payment plan platforms have emerged. There is encouraging data on the viability of payment plans. A 2022 study analyzed 6 years of veterinary payment plan data (covering thousands of plans that did not use traditional credit checks) and found that 93.1% of accounts were fully repaid[56][57]. Only 6.9% of the amount financed ended up unpaid[57], which is a relatively low default rate. The researchers introduced a concept of a “veterinary care multiplier” – essentially, if clinics (or nonprofit funds) can cover that ~7% of unpaid balances, they could provide 14.5 times more veterinary care to pets who might otherwise be turned away[56]. In practical terms, this means well-structured payment plans can drastically improve access to care without devastating the clinic’s finances. Many clinics now advertise financing options on their websites to avoid “sticker shock” deterrence. For example, an emergency/specialty hospital might mention that payment plans or credit can be approved in minutes for a large surgery, giving pet owners a feasible path instead of opting for economic euthanasia. While managing payment plans adds administrative work (tracking installments, following up on late payments), the data suggests it can be worthwhile – it not only helps pets get needed care, but also brings in revenue the clinic might have otherwise lost.
- Point-of-sale (POS) financing and pet insurance direct pay: Another recent development is POS financing systems that integrate with practice software. These allow clients to enroll in a payment plan or apply for credit right in the exam room on a tablet, streamlining the process. Some pet insurance companies have also launched “direct pay” models where the insurer pays the vet directly (so the client doesn’t have to front the money and wait for reimbursement). While still not common, direct pay insurance could reduce clinics’ collection risk if it grows, since the clinic is assured payment from the insurer for covered services.
Despite new financing tools, the best practice financially for clinics is still to collect as much as possible at time of service. Veterinary business advisors emphasize an assertive but empathetic approach: “When you bill clients, you’re loaning them money… You offer high-quality care, but you’re also a small business owner who needs to improve cash flow. So start asking for payment at the time of service.”[58] Many clinics have implemented policies such as requiring a deposit for expensive treatments or surgeries, and full payment upon discharge. They also establish protocols for overdue accounts – for example, sending bills at set intervals, charging interest or late fees (though many admit to waiving these in practice), and referring accounts to a collection agency after, say, 90 days of non-payment. Use of collection agencies is typically a last resort due to fees and potential damage to client relations, but it’s sometimes necessary for large balances. Clinics must balance being compassionate (many veterinarians will quietly write off small balances for clients in hardship or provide “goodwill discounts”) with being fair to their business.
Financial workflow efficiency is another area of focus. Handling billing and payments can be time-consuming: preparing invoices, processing payments, managing refunds, insurance claim paperwork, etc., all take staff time. To streamline this, practices have widely adopted integrated practice management software that generates invoices from medical records and can even email them to clients. Digital payment systems (credit card on file, mobile card readers in exam rooms, online payment portals) have improved convenience. For instance, some clinics now take payment via text link or mobile app – after an appointment, the client gets a secure link to pay their bill, which many appreciate for speed. The COVID curbside model accelerated some of these changes, with clinics taking card numbers over the phone or using contactless payments so clients didn’t have to come inside.
Even with these improvements, billing remains a stress point for staff. Front desk personnel are tasked not only with collecting payment but often with discussing charges if an owner is surprised or upset. This can lead to uncomfortable situations, especially if there was a miscommunication about the expected cost. Clear communication and transparency are thus essential parts of the financial workflow. Providing written estimates and getting signed approval before treatment helps prevent disputes. Many clinics now use estimate templates and have the client sign digitally, which then automatically updates the invoice. If during treatment the costs will exceed the estimate, good practice is to communicate and get approval for the overage (or adjust the plan). Handling these conversations professionally is part of front-desk and manager training.
From a financial performance standpoint, veterinary practices track metrics like accounts receivable (AR) as a percentage of revenue, AR turnover (how many times AR is collected per year), and the labor cost ratio. It’s noted that labor is the single largest expense for clinics – roughly 42–50% of each dollar of revenue goes to staff costs on average[59]. Inefficient billing (like not collecting promptly) can exacerbate cash flow issues because so much of revenue is needed to pay salaries. A high AR or many overdue accounts essentially means the practice has less cash to pay its own expenses. Ideally, a small-animal clinic keeps AR very low (most clients pay same-day). Equine and food animal practices historically had AR in the range of 20–40% of annual revenue tied up in outstanding bills, but many are trying to reduce that with more upfront payment policies.
One positive trend is that cultural attitudes in vet med are shifting to acknowledge the importance of financial policies. There’s more talk about “healthy boundaries” – vets realizing that providing endless uncompensated care or bending policies for fear of upsetting clients is not sustainable. At the same time, the industry is promoting financial assistance programs to help genuinely needy clients: from charity funds (like every clinic having a Good Samaritan fund for stray cases or clients in crisis) to partnerships with pet care nonprofits. This dual approach – firm but fair payment expectations coupled with available hardship options – is emerging as a best practice.
In summary, veterinary operations must deftly handle billing and collections to remain solvent. The past few years have underscored challenges: more clients needing flexibility in payments and higher costs of care. Clinics are responding with a mix of technology (integrated billing, online payments), policy (time-of-service payment requirements, deposits), and client-focused solutions (payment plans, third-party financing). By tightening financial workflows (e.g. reducing collection times) and offering avenues that make pet care affordable (without simply writing off charges), practices can improve both their financial health and client relationships. As one expert bluntly advised colleagues: don’t be afraid to talk about money – you’re running a healthcare business, and timely payment is an accepted norm in other industries from human medicine to auto repair[58][60]. The clinics that have embraced this mindset, while still showing empathy and creativity in helping clients pay, are better positioned to thrive in the current economic landscape.
Sources: Recent peer-reviewed and professional sources were used to compile this analysis, including studies and reports from the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, AVMA and AAHA surveys, and industry white papers[1][2][14][30][41][37][56][53], among others. These provide the data and trends referenced regarding veterinary operational challenges in the U.S. over the past 1–5 years.
[1] Compensation Best Practices in 2020 - Veterinary Business Advisors
https://veterinarybusinessadvisors.com/compensation-best-practices-in-2020/
[2] [3] The nonprofit veterinarian shortage: Who will care for the pets most in need? » Shelter Medicine Program » College of Veterinary Medicine » University of Florida
[4] [6] (PDF) Merck Animal Health Veterinary Team study reveals factors associated with well-being, burnout, and mental health among nonveterinarian practice team members
[5] [7] [8] [9] Veterinary profession heading in right direction with mental health | American Veterinary Medical Association
https://www.avma.org/news/veterinary-profession-heading-right-direction-mental-health
[10] [11] [13] Microsoft Word - VINFoundation_SolutionsfortheProfessionEssayCompetition_2022FIRST_PLACE_IanDoody.docx
https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/january-2024/staff-retention-survey/
[14] Are we in a veterinary workforce crisis? | American Veterinary Medical Association
https://www.avma.org/javma-news/2021-09-15/are-we-veterinary-workforce-crisis
[18] [25] Overcoming understaffing
https://www.dvm360.com/view/overcoming-understaffing
[19] [20] [21] [24] Increased efficiency could lessen the need for more staff in companion animal practice - PubMed
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37257829/
[22] [23] [26] [27] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] From note taking to scheduling, technology can help veterinary practices in many ways | American Veterinary Medical Association
https://www.avma.org/news/note-taking-scheduling-technology-can-help-veterinary-practices-many-ways
[28] Can online booking can boost your veterinary practice revenue?
[36] A Pilot Study Examining the Experience of Veterinary Telehealth in ...
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9083193/
[37] [38] [47] [51] Veterinary visits decline as clients face rising costs, data reveals
https://www.dvm360.com/view/veterinary-visits-decline-as-clients-face-rising-costs-data-reveals
[39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [50] [59] How to Improve Communications with a Veterinary Client Communication Software & Tech | LifeLearn
[44] Why online booking is essential for veterinary practices
https://www.mwiah.com/our-insights/why-online-booking-is-essential-for-veterinary-practices
[45] Why Online Appointment Scheduling Is Crucial to Increase Bookings
https://www.lifelearn.com/2024/07/10/online-appointment-scheduling/
[46] Veterinary client communication: Why text and chat is where it's at
https://vetsource.com/blog/veterinary-client-communication-why-text-and-chat-is-where-its-at/
[48] [49] Veterinary clients prefer benefit-focused online communication while ...
https://avmajournals.avma.org/view/journals/javma/263/1/javma.24.09.0568.xml
[52] [53] [54] [58] [60] Dust off your veterinary practice's accounts receivable
https://www.dvm360.com/view/dust-your-veterinary-practices-accounts-receivable
[55] [56] [57] Frontiers | Payment options: An analysis of 6 years of payment plan data and potential implications for for-profit clinics, non-profit veterinary providers, and funders to access to care initiatives
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.895532/full